Andrew Suffield wrote:
>I don't see what's so interesting about the group of things in which
>copyright would subsist if the world were different.
Perhaps you've missed the point. I'll try more detail:
Whether there exists a valid copyright on a work depends on
* aspects intrinsic to the work
*
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:33:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:36:14PM +0200, Martin Dickopp wrote:
>
>
> > The proper terms for what you describe here are "copyright does not
> > subsist in this work", where the verb is "subsist" (alt
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:36:14PM +0200, Martin Dickopp wrote:
> The proper terms for what you describe here are "copyright does not
> subsist in this work", where the verb is "subsist" (alternatively
> "copyright protection does not subsist", but even lawyers don't
> u
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 00:16 +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:36:14PM +0200, Martin Dickopp wrote:
> > "Humberto Massa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > In another topic, I prefer the term "copyrighted". "Copyrightable" is
> > > an ugly, ugly term... and everything t
@ 13/05/2004 20:16 : wrote Andrew Suffield :
The proper terms for what you describe here are "copyright does not
subsist in this work", where the verb is "subsist" (alternatively
"copyright protection does not subsist", but even lawyers don't
usually go that far).
In Portuguese-Legalese the e
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:36:14PM +0200, Martin Dickopp wrote:
> "Humberto Massa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In another topic, I prefer the term "copyrighted". "Copyrightable" is
> > an ugly, ugly term... and everything that is copyrightable is
> > copyrighted by default...
>
> I see a fi
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> What about works by the CIA?
They're certainly not copyrighted...
> Is copyright irrelevant to classified material?
Well, considering that unauthorized distribution of copyrighted
material is either a misdemeanor or a felony, and according to my
consp
Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Humberto Massa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In another topic, I prefer the term "copyrighted". "Copyrightable" is
>> an ugly, ugly term... and everything that is copyrightable is
>> copyrighted by default...
>
> I see a fine distinction between th
"Humberto Massa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In another topic, I prefer the term "copyrighted". "Copyrightable" is
> an ugly, ugly term... and everything that is copyrightable is
> copyrighted by default...
I see a fine distinction between the two terms. For example, a work
created by the U.S.
9 matches
Mail list logo