Re: analog license; Debian bug 121916

2002-01-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 04:06:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I wish I had a date, but I don't. > > > > Me too. Oh, you meant a date for the *release*. I just wish I had a > > date. > >

Re: analog license; Debian bug 121916

2002-01-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 04:06:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I wish I had a date, but I don't. > > Me too. Oh, you meant a date for the *release*. I just wish I had a > date. I thought you swore those off when you became a monk... :) --

Re: analog license; Debian bug 121916

2002-01-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 10:51:38AM +, Stephen Turner wrote: > An actual date would be helpful. I am working on a new version at the > moment, and I was planning to change the licence in that version. But > if you give me a definite deadline, I can make sure to work to that. I apologize on beha

Re: analog license; Debian bug 121916

2002-01-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wish I had a date, but I don't. Me too. Oh, you meant a date for the *release*. I just wish I had a date.

Re: analog license; Debian bug 121916

2002-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
Stephen Turner wrote: > Actually, my understanding was that debian-legal couldn't agree whether it > was free or not, although I agreed to change it so that we could all agree > that it was free. Yeah. > An actual date would be helpful. I am working on a new version at the > moment, and I was pla

Re: analog license; Debian bug 121916

2002-01-03 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Joey Hess wrote: > Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > So this is still around; the current license for analog seems to be > > non-free, but the upstream maintainer is willing to adapt. However, > > it needs to be resolved; the freeze is coming. If it can't be > > resolved, then

Re: analog license; Debian bug 121916

2002-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > So this is still around; the current license for analog seems to be > non-free, but the upstream maintainer is willing to adapt. However, > it needs to be resolved; the freeze is coming. If it can't be > resolved, then bug 121916 will operate (as it should) to keep a

analog license; Debian bug 121916

2002-01-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
So this is still around; the current license for analog seems to be non-free, but the upstream maintainer is willing to adapt. However, it needs to be resolved; the freeze is coming. If it can't be resolved, then bug 121916 will operate (as it should) to keep analog out of woody, which would be