On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:23:26AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > If -legal is specifically discussing a license of a package, the
> > maintainer is generally informed[1]
>
> it was not in this case, since the first mention i had was that
> consensus was
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:23:26AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> [This is wildly OT for -vote, MFT set to -legal and CC:'ed, please
> follow up there or privately.]
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:52:20AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Still, deb
[This is wildly OT for -vote, MFT set to -legal and CC:'ed, please
follow up there or privately.]
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:52:20AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Still, debian-legal should inform the maintainers and invite them to take
> > > part
3 matches
Mail list logo
