On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:10:10 -0800 (PST), Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Roger Ward wrote:
>> Thanks Henning & Mark for the replies - sorry I had to ask yet again,
>> but I use this and hate to not be able to Do What I Want with the
>> source. Its sad there is not a way i
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Roger Ward wrote:
> Thanks Henning & Mark for the replies - sorry I had to ask yet again,
> but I use this and hate to not be able to Do What I Want with the
> source. Its sad there is not a way it would work out.
Have you contacted the upstream? It's always possible they'd
Thanks Henning & Mark for the replies - sorry I had to ask yet again, but I use
this and hate to not be able to Do What I Want with the source. Its sad there
is not a way it would work out.
-Roger Ward
Quoting Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Scripsit Roger Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Rather than paste the EULA (it has been pasted several times) here is a URL
> which will display it from their webserver:
> http://www.unrealircd.org/downloads.php?eula=1
It says (no, shouts), among other things:
| THE AUTHORS MAINTAIN THE RIGHT TO MODI
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Roger Ward wrote:
> What is the status of the EULA discussion about UnrealIRCd?
Last I heard, it's pretty clearly not distributable, let alone free. It
seems likely they're violating copyright if they're using any code under
the GPL not authored by them.
> The debian bug a
What is the status of the EULA discussion about UnrealIRCd? I use this on my
personal machines for a few different purposes, and I'd like to see it supported
in Debian. I am willing to package it, but wanted to request any relevant
comments.
The debian bug archives at http://b.d.o/148319 has a f
6 matches
Mail list logo
