[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:51:11AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
>>Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>So, the soundfont license needs to be very permissive, but I don't think
>>>there should be any concern about the tool used to create it.
>>
>>The license of the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:20:27PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:41:29PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > > Although I would agree with that, the main matter here is not whether
> > > this WAV file would be appropriate fo
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:41:29PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > Although I would agree with that, the main matter here is not whether
> > this WAV file would be appropriate for main or contrib, but whether it
> > is distributable at all, since the GPLv2 requires complete source code,
> > which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:05:58PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:51:11AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > IMHO, the license of the sequencing software you used is completely
>
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:51:11AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMHO, the license of the sequencing software you used is completely
> > irrelevant. You USE a toolchain when you create with it, you don't
> > DERIVE from it (the exception being things lik
Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO, the license of the sequencing software you used is completely
> irrelevant. You USE a toolchain when you create with it, you don't
> DERIVE from it (the exception being things like libraries -- or
> soundfonts -- that get incorporated into the result
Andrew Sidwell wrote:
> I'm sorry, I didn't make myself clear. That last paragraph was meant to
> indicate WAV files which were derived from MIDI files via use of
> non-free soundfonts, not the original MIDI file itself.
The DFSG would require that the soundfont license be "DFSG free" in
order fo
Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:40:25PM +0100, Andrew Sidwell wrote:
>> If someone releases a song in MIDI form under the GPLv2, and I use
>> non-GPL'd tools (e.g. a shareware licence) and royalty-free instrumental
>> samples to produce a high-quality WAV version of the original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:40:25PM +0100, Andrew Sidwell wrote:
> If someone releases a song in MIDI form under the GPLv2, and I use
> non-GPL'd tools (e.g. a shareware licence) and royalty-free instrumental
> samples to produce a high-quality WAV vers
I have a question somewhat related to something mentioned here a short
while ago.
If someone releases a song in MIDI form under the GPLv2, and I use
non-GPL'd tools (e.g. a shareware licence) and royalty-free instrumental
samples to produce a high-quality WAV version of the original MIDI, can
I le
10 matches
Mail list logo
