Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's been several days with no activity in this thread.
>
> Can someone please summarize it? I realize the original specific
> instance motivating this discussion has been resolved (at least it
> appears that way), but I still think it's worthwhile f
It's been several days with no activity in this thread.
Can someone please summarize it? I realize the original specific
instance motivating this discussion has been resolved (at least it
appears that way), but I still think it's worthwhile for us to document
why we find the OSL 2.0 DFSG-nonfree.
2 matches
Mail list logo
