Summary of the CC-by

2004-04-06 Thread Jeremy Hankins
Debian-legal has concluded that the CC-by (Creative Commons Attribution license) v1.0 is not a DFSG-free license. It is quite possible that Creative Commons does not intend this to be a Free license in the sense of the DFSG. However, since requiring attribution and credit is acceptable under the

Re: DRAFT summary of the CC-by, feedback requested

2004-04-05 Thread Humberto Massa
@ 04/04/2004 03:57 : wrote Nathanael Nerode : Here are some comments on the draft summary: I think I'd make these changes > It is likely that Creative Commons does not intend this to be a > Free "quite possible"? I'm not sure about "likely". > license in the sense of the DFSG. However, since

Re: DRAFT summary of the CC-by, feedback requested

2004-04-04 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Here are some comments on the draft summary: I think I'd make these changes >It is likely that Creative Commons does not intend this to be a Free "quite possible"? I'm not sure about "likely". >license in the sense of the DFSG. However, since requiring attribution >and credit is acceptable under

DRAFT summary of the CC-by, feedback requested

2004-04-03 Thread Jeremy Hankins
ite (other than the DFSG faq) on problem #3. --- Begin *DRAFT* Debian-legal summary of the CC-by --- Debian-legal has concluded that the CC-by (Creative Commons Attribution license) v1.0 is not a DFSG-free license. It is likely that Creative Commons does not intend this to be a Free license in th