> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:47:37 -0500
> From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:27:55AM -0400, Boris Veytsman wrote:
> > However, I agree with David Carlisle, that this discussion is
> > moot. The present LPPL conforms to the present DFSG.
>
> "Present" meaning t
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:27:55AM -0400, Boris Veytsman wrote:
> However, I agree with David Carlisle, that this discussion is
> moot. The present LPPL conforms to the present DFSG.
"Present" meaning the one currently in force, or "present" meaning the
one Debian was actually asked to evaluate, t
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:27:55AM -0400, Boris Veytsman wrote:
> Documents in Microsoft Word last only until the company behind them
> decides to make a format change and milk the customers for a new
> version of their software. The fact that your decade old LaTeX paper
> is as good as new, while
I apologize for being so prolific writer on this list. Still, I'd like
to clear an important point.
When we talked about LaTeX being both a program and a language
standard, some Debian people told us that this situation is the same
as with Perl, Python, Ruby etc. I think there is a big difference
4 matches
Mail list logo
