d from SRFI
implementations, and several of those reference implementations are
covered by the standard SRFI copyright license (others are covered by
a different, clearly DFSG-free license, like those by Olin Shivers,
like SRFI 1). One particular example of such a scheme implementation
is Guile, which contains S
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> The license clearly allows you to derive works, as long as you do not
> change the SRFI itself.
The above sentence is in conflict with itself. A deriviative work must
necessarily change the SRFI itself. The end product might not be an
SRFI anymore,
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Jakob Bohm wrote:
The main trick is to distinguish between the original full text SRFI
("the document") and the free software (document that excerpts or
derives from the document).
Sure, but if you take that tack, the prohibition of modification of
"
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> The main trick is to distinguish between the original full text SRFI
> ("the document") and the free software (document that excerpts or
> derives from the document).
Sure, but if you take that tack, the prohibition of modification of
"the document" becomes
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 02:16:45PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> > I strongly disagree: the license is just saying that you can't
> > publish a derivative work of SRFI X as SRFI X, and are otherwise free
> > to derive works.
>
> Could you step throug
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I wish to get your opinions on the case of the reference
> implementations in the SRFI's. An SRFI, Scheme Request For
> Implementation, is the process by which the Scheme community agrees on
> standard libraries and features for various scheme
> implementations. Every S
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> I strongly disagree: the license is just saying that you can't
> publish a derivative work of SRFI X as SRFI X, and are otherwise free
> to derive works.
Could you step through your logic of that, without relying on the FAQ?
As near as I can parse i
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Every SRFI contains a reference implementation, and bears this
>> copyright notice:
>>
>> Copyright (C) /author/ (/year/). All Rights Reserved.
>>
>> This document and translations of it may be copi
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 01:40:33PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Every SRFI contains a reference implementation, and bears this
>> copyright notice:
>> Is a scheme implementation that includes the reference
>> implementation DFSG-free (providing th
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Every SRFI contains a reference implementation, and bears this
> copyright notice:
>
> Copyright (C) /author/ (/year/). All Rights Reserved.
>
> This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
> others, and derivative work
Hi,
(This is the next episode of the "let's free scsh" saga.)
I wish to get your opinions on the case of the reference
implementations in the SRFI's. An SRFI, Scheme Request For
Implementation, is the process by which the Scheme community agrees on
standard libraries and features for various sche
11 matches
Mail list logo
