Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-18 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
(Yeah, I know, late response) On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 08:06, Richard Braakman wrote: > So, what's the difference? What did you do with the erols.com address > that you didn't do with the suespammers address? Not sure, really. But as I said, most of it seems to be single opt-in crap. > > > I

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-07 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My theory is that the address harvesters are trying to be smart and are > deleting the "spam" substring from your address. Some poor bastard at > suemers.org is getting all your spam :) If they were being "smart" they would just send to both. I mea

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-07 Thread Richard Braakman
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 06:19:26AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Seriously, I have posted many, many, places with my suespammers > address. I get little spam at it, but a piece or two a day. OTOH, my > [EMAIL PROTECTED] address gets nailed with tens of pieces a day. So, what's the differenc

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-07 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Is there any actual evidence that obscuring email addresses in common forms like "asd at suespammers dot org" actually does any good? Has anyone actually created two random email addresses, and posted them to the same web page, one obscured, one not, and seen if there is a measurable differenc

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-03 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 04:01:53PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:31:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > Debian does not redact its mailing list archives. > > It seems from looking at the URL posted that this is an unusual situation -- > the request is coming from s

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:08:47PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Sun, 01 Sep 2002, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:17:10PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > Michael Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I don't know if/how well it would work for somethin

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sun, 01 Sep 2002, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:17:10PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Michael Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I don't know if/how well it would work for something as high traffic as > > > the Debian lists but the Nashville Linux Use

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread David B Harris
On 02 Sep 2002 01:33:54 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) wrote: > David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This probably just means that if they want to go after somebody, > > they have to go after the person who posted the message and seek > > damages. > > What possible dam

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This probably just means that if they want to go after somebody, they > have to go after the person who posted the message and seek damages. What possible damages? In the United States, at least, you are allowed to say the truth. I know that in the U

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread David B Harris
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:01:53 -0500 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Debian does not redact its mailing list archives. > > It seems from looking at the URL posted that this is an unusual > situation -- the request is coming from someone whose e-mail address > appears on the To: line of a

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:17:10PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Michael Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't know if/how well it would work for something as high traffic as > > the Debian lists but the Nashville Linux User Group website has a > > tutorial for setting up "spa

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:08:55PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > I don't think that's "unusual" or any kind of exception. Short of > > things like libel, anything I say on the Debian lists should get > > archived, whether it's something someo

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know if/how well it would work for something as high traffic as > the Debian lists but the Nashville Linux User Group website has a > tutorial for setting up "spam proof" mailing list archives by converting > all e-mail addresses into image

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread Michael Schultheiss
Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 05:18:45PM -0400, Ian L. wrote: > > I agree with Mr. Bushnell. I simply hope that the Debian list archives > > uses some sort of email munging mechanism in the future to make the > > archives less harvestable by email-grabbing robots. > > I don't o

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 05:18:45PM -0400, Ian L. wrote: > I agree with Mr. Bushnell. I simply hope that the Debian list archives > uses some sort of email munging mechanism in the future to make the > archives less harvestable by email-grabbing robots. I don't object to this, as long as: 1) we ap

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 04:10:30PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > I don't think that's "unusual" or any kind of exception. Short of > > things like libel, anything I say on the Debian lists should get > > archived, whether it's something someone else doesn't want published > > or not. > > We're

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread Ian L.
On 9/1/02 5:08 PM, Thomas Bushnell, BSG enlightened us with: > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:31:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: >> >>> Debian does not redact its mailing list archives. >> >> It seems from looking at the URL posted that this is an u

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread John Goerzen
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:08:55PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > I don't think that's "unusual" or any kind of exception. Short of > things like libel, anything I say on the Debian lists should get > archived, whether it's something someone else doesn't want published > or not. We're no

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:31:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > Debian does not redact its mailing list archives. > > It seems from looking at the URL posted that this is an unusual situation -- > the request is coming from someone whose e-mail

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-01 Thread John Goerzen
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:31:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Debian does not redact its mailing list archives. It seems from looking at the URL posted that this is an unusual situation -- the request is coming from someone whose e-mail address appears on the To: line of a message posted by

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-08-31 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 04:00:27PM -0400, Ian L. wrote: > Please remove my two email addresses that end in "@logicallemon.com" from > the following URL: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00162.html > > Thank you. Debian does not redact its mailing list archives

Removal of Email Address

2002-08-31 Thread Ian L.
Please remove my two email addresses that end in "@logicallemon.com" from the following URL: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00162.html Thank you. -- Ian L. http://www.logicallemon.com/ - Perl, Mac OS X, Zsh, Vim - bass guitar, downtempo electronica