> Thanks. I only looked at stable. But in the ripOLE directory is still
> the old license. Please clarify.
Please see the new 1.3-dev package, it should now have the ripOLE licence
changed too.
Appologies about the difficulties.
Incidently, 1.3-dev is considered more stable/featureful than 1.
Paul L Daniels wrote:
Hi there Willi,
They agree that this license *seems to be* DFSG-free but they don't like
I find this interesting - the ripMIME licence is supposed to be the standard
BSD type licence - ie, the one without the
advertising clause.
Please check with 1.3-dev sources for
Hi there Willi,
> They agree that this license *seems to be* DFSG-free but they don't like
I find this interesting - the ripMIME licence is supposed to be the standard
BSD type licence - ie, the one without the
advertising clause.
Please check with 1.3-dev sources for the updated licence.
Ki
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-02-22 16:43:36 + Willi Mann V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Such redistributions must allow further use, modification, and
> > redistribution of the Source Code under substantially the same
> > terms as this license.
>
> I think this is DFSG-
On 2004-02-22 16:43:36 + Willi Mann V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ripMIME LICENSE
Summary: yuck. IMO, this licence seems DFSG-free, but it is confusing.
I hope his lawyer did not charge him too much for it. Also, it has
some "lawyerbombs" for me: terms that m
Willi Mann V. wrote:
> ripMIME LICENSE
>
> The following license terms and conditions apply, unless a different
> license is obtained from P.L.Daniels, P.O.Box 6, Ravenswood, 4816
> Australia, or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> License Terms:
>
> Use, Mod
6 matches
Mail list logo
