Brian Ristuccia writes:
> I think sort of thing would prompt at least a "this trademark is ours"
> angry-gram from the owner of the TouchTone mark.
It would do no such thing. Do you think that GM sends Ford an "angry-gram"
every time a Ford executive says "chevrolet"? A trademark is not a
copyr
Brian Ristuccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, I see that as a comparison to open source, not a claim that
> their Community Source license is an open source license.
This to me sounds like someone going on and on about the features and
benefits of their alternate tone-based t
Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> I think sort of thing would prompt at least a "this trademark is ours"
> angry-gram from the owner of the TouchTone mark. IANAL, but I don't see how
> the Open Source mark and it's use by folks at Sun Microsystems would be any
> different in this sort of instance.
But he
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 09:29:38PM -0500, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Brian Ristuccia writes:
>> http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1014005,00.html
>
>> If SPI still owns this mark, someone needs to send Sun Microsystems a
>> cease-an
Ben Pfaff writes:
> However, I see that as a comparison to open source, not a claim that
> their Community Source license is an open source license.
Yes. He has as much right to mention Open Source as we do to mention Sun
Microsystems. He just can't use it as a label on something he is selling.
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian Ristuccia writes:
> http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1014005,00.html
> If SPI still owns this mark, someone needs to send Sun Microsystems a
> cease-and-desist before we lose it.
I see no evidence of infringement of the
Brian Ristuccia writes:
> http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1014005,00.html
> If SPI still owns this mark, someone needs to send Sun Microsystems a
> cease-and-desist before we lose it.
I see no evidence of infringement of the Open Source mark at that URL.
--
John Hasler
7 matches
Mail list logo