[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
> About the modules/ files. I wrote most of them. What kind of copyright
> would you find useful, given that it's only meta-information?
>
> I suggest, based on the advice in maintain.texi:
>
> Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> Cop
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 03:22:01PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-09-22 14:58:24 +0100 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >[ putting debian-legal on CC ]
>
> For what end?
Because gnulib is ITPed (#272867), we need to sort out possible legal problems
before adding it to Debian, and deb
On 2004-09-22 14:58:24 +0100 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ putting debian-legal on CC ]
For what end?
There's also the problem with non-free documentation in "doc"
directory (3
files), but I'm aware that for the FSF freedom isn't important for
documentation so I'm ommiting the
3 matches
Mail list logo
