This one time, at band camp, Frank Küster said:
> Wolfgang Lonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Stephen Gran wrote:
> >> This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:25:54AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> > > >
> > > > THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHO
Wolfgang Lonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
>> This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
>>> THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
>>> SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR PROPERTY.
>> This is possibly problematic, depend
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:25:54AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> > >
> > > THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
> > > SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIF
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> >
> > THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
> > SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR PROPERTY.
>
> This is possibly problematic, depending on how you d
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:45:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> > I don't think that the clause is necessarily a problem, though -- it reads
> > to me more like a slightly more emphatic no-warranty clause, rather than a
> > prohibition against use in any particular field.
>
> So what should I d
Hi Matt & list,
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:12:59AM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
The TwistedSNMP-0.3.13/license.txt reads:
THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR PROPERTY.
>>> This is possibly pro
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:12:59AM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> >>The TwistedSNMP-0.3.13/license.txt reads:
> >>THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
> >>SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR PROPERTY.
> > This is possibly problematic, depending on how you define "shoul
Scripsit Wolfgang Lonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please CC me when answering; I'm not subscribed to Debian-legal.
What was your question? The three licenses you quote are all ordinary
3-clause BSD licenses, which are nice and free.
--
Henning Makholm "The man who catches a meninin
Hi Matt (& list),
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
>
>>| |-- DCOracle2-cvs.tar.gz- +(ask)
>>| |-- TwistedSNMP-0.3.13.tar.gz - +(ask)
>>| `-- sybase-0.36.tar.gz
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> | |-- DCOracle2-cvs.tar.gz- +(ask)
> | |-- TwistedSNMP-0.3.13.tar.gz - +(ask)
> | `-- sybase-0.36.tar.gz - +(ask)
>
> The "DCOra
12 matches
Mail list logo