On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:26:14AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Heh, m, heh-heh. Hey Butthead! I'm a "hard-liner"!
>
> Heh, m, heh. Heh-heh-heh. He said "hard".
>
> So, uh, I can go orchestra a coup against Gorbachev, now, right? :)
s/orchestra/&te/
Hmm. Apparently when I shift into "
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:27:41AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'm not sure this would be so overly helpful. This would increase the
> possibility of creating sluggish compromise which would maybe agreed
> with the diplomats but not accepted by the project afterwards -- not
> even speaking of B
Bruce Perens wrote:
> Richard, Branden, and Co.,
>
> I remain convinced that hot tempers are getting in the way. Thus, I would like
> to make two requests:
>
> 1. That the Debian folks designate someone other than Branden to speak
>the Debian side of this argument. Diplomacy counts. Branden,
On 2003-09-11, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we were to elect a person to serve in this role, I suggest we permit
> people to self-nominate for a period, and then the Developers can elect
> one using the procedure described in the Debian Constitution. ...
Depending on the inten
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:48:26PM +, Dylan Thurston wrote:
> On 2003-09-11, Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it be useful for debian-legal to designate a point-man, as it
> > were, who could summarize discussions here and send the result to the
> > FSF? It would introduce q
On 2003-09-11, Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Bruce Perens
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>> I am hoping that I can deal with both organizations _as_
>>> organizations.
>>
>> I think this very pr
On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 02:38 US/Eastern, Bruce Perens wrote:
Were I in your place, I might consider retreating to debian-private
Many of the participants in this discussion on the 'Debian side' are
not developers, as evidenced by the recent poll here. I personally fall
into that categor
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Bruce Perens
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I am hoping that I can deal with both organizations _as_
>> organizations.
>
> I think this very premise is shaky. No one person can really
> represent the Debian pr
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 11:15:35 -0400, Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think we (Debian) would be nuts of deprive ourselves of Branden's
> experience with licensing issues, and this issue in particular. RMS
> doesn't read -legal and I'm quite sure other FSF readers won't read
> pers
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:56:51 -0700 (PDT), Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Richard, Branden, and Co., I remain convinced that hot tempers are
> getting in the way. Thus, I would like to make two requests:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:40:08AM -0400, Walter Landry wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a postscript, could you please summarize, to the debian-private list,
> > the efforts you've made to date to bring the parties to the table, apart
> > from those we've already seen on
Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What, specifically are you requesting?
> >
> > A) That I stop CCing or otherwise mailing RMS with queries or commentary
> >on this subject until your efforts have reached a conclusion, or are
> >aband
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:40:08AM -0400, Walter Landry wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a postscript, could you please summarize, to the debian-private
> > list, the efforts you've made to date to bring the parties to the
> > table, apart from those we've already seen on
Branden Robinson wrote:
[RMS not CCed]
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:56:51PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
Richard, Branden, and Co.,
As a postscript, could you please summarize, to the debian-private list,
the efforts you've made to date to bring the parties to the table, apart
from those we'
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As a postscript, could you please summarize, to the debian-private list,
> the efforts you've made to date to bring the parties to the table, apart
> from those we've already seen on this list?
There's nothing I can't say here. I have had some off-list
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a postscript, could you please summarize, to the debian-private list,
> the efforts you've made to date to bring the parties to the table, apart
> from those we've already seen on this list?
I object. This is not appropriate for debian-private. Th
> Brendan, I especially need you
I need to spell your name right. Sorry.
Bruce
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What, specifically are you requesting?
>
> A) That I stop CCing or otherwise mailing RMS with queries or commentary
>on this subject until your efforts have reached a conclusion, or are
>abandoned;
>
> or
>
> B) That I be placed under a gag or
[RMS not CCed]
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:56:51PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Richard, Branden, and Co.,
>
> I remain convinced that hot tempers are getting in the way. Thus, I would like
> to make two requests:
>
> 1. That the Debian folks designate someone other than Branden to speak
>the
19 matches
Mail list logo
