Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-*: non-distributable

2004-10-12 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Marco d'Itri wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>This package should be removed from Debian before Debian gets sued for >>copyright infringement. > Can you cut this bullshit please? You know well that Debian is not going > to get sued. Well, the corporations issuing the "firmware" haven't been

Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-*: non-distributable

2004-10-11 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >This package should be removed from Debian before Debian gets sued for >copyright infringement. Can you cut this bullshit please? You know well that Debian is not going to get sued. -- ciao, Marco

[Fwd: Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-*: non-distributable]

2004-10-10 Thread Martin Braure de Calignon
--- Begin Message --- Thanks for your answer, I have a mail from one of the developper of this software : There's a wiki url to see about that : http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=DeveloppementGPL It seems to me (Benoit Audouard) that you incorrectly inferred that we want to change licen

Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-*: non-distributable

2004-10-10 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Martin Braure de Calignon wrote: > I wanted to know if the binary files in the > eagle-usb-{utils,data,source} package are free. No. > When I get the source of the package (apt-get source), there is a > LICENSE file in the root directory which says that the package is GPL. > But in the eagle-us