Ferenc Kovacs writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl
extensions"):
> Thanks for the reply.
Sorry about the delay replying. This one is more complicated than
most.
> I see that there is no answer for Q4 in your forwarded mail, was that
> origina
2016. febr. 22. 20:12 ezt írta ("Ferenc Kovacs" ):
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> I see that there is no answer for Q4 in your forwarded mail, was that
originally not answered or just lost somewhere when forwarding?
> My understanding on the first look is that the PHP license is flawed
(tr
On 2/22/2016 2:12 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> My understanding on the first look is that the PHP license is flawed
> (tries to limit the usage of php in naming but that is a futile
> attempt without registering a trademark)
Your premise that registration is required before trademark rights
accrue
e I'm missing which would make debian distributing
pear/pecl.php.net packages problematic based on this legal advice?
2016. febr. 22. 18:40 ezt írta ("Ian Jackson" <
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk>):
> Ferenc Kovacs writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for
&
Ferenc Kovacs writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl
extensions"):
> I was just wondering if you were contacted or that you still plan to
> publish the legal advice received back then?
Thanks for the reminder. I knew I wouldn't need to ma
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Ian Jackson <
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Ferenc Kovacs writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for
> pear/pecl extensions"):
> > Thanks, I will try to not give up.
>
> I think this continued delay is g
Ferenc Kovacs writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl
extensions"):
> Thanks, I will try to not give up.
I think this continued delay is getting rather silly. I have heard
nothing other than these periodic pings. Can someone explain to me
what the reaso
2016. jan. 14. 5:00 ezt írta ("Charles Plessy" ):
>
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >>
> >> On the 2nd of July I got via Neil a message on this topic from
SFLC.
> >> IIRC we were planning to publish it, or a synopsis, or something ?
>
> On Fri
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>
>> On the 2nd of July I got via Neil a message on this topic from SFLC.
>> IIRC we were planning to publish it, or a synopsis, or something ?
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> AI
PM, Neil McGovern
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> >> > (resending because my MUA messed up)
>> >> >
>> >> > Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: debian status on using the P
Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> > (resending because my MUA messed up)
> >> >
> >> > Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license
> for pear/pecl extensions"):
> >> > > When I was the DPL, I forwarded Ian's set of qu
2015. dec. 3. 22:20 ezt írta ("Ferenc Kovacs" ):
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > (resending because my MUA messed up)
>> >
>> > Lucas
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > (resending because my MUA messed up)
> >
> > Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for
> pear/pecl extensions&q
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> (resending because my MUA messed up)
>
> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for
> pear/pecl extensions"):
> > When I was the DPL, I forwarded Ian's set of questions t
(resending because my MUA messed up)
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for
pear/pecl extensions"):
> When I was the DPL, I forwarded Ian's set of questions to SFLC. I did
> not receive any feedback before the end of my term, but this quest
Hi,
When I was the DPL, I forwarded Ian's set of questions to SFLC. I did
not receive any feedback before the end of my term, but this question
was part of the things I forwarded to Neil when he took over. I'm Ccing
leader@, maybe he can comment about the status of this.
- Lucas
signature.asc
D
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Ángel González wrote:
> If the current FAQ entry related to PHP hasn't changed since
> http://web.archive.org/web/20051016231155/http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html,
> I don't think the entry, and most importantly the phrase « That license, up
> to the 3
If the current FAQ entry related to PHP hasn't changed since
http://web.archive.org/web/20051016231155/http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html,
I don't think the entry, and most importantly the phrase « That license,
up to the 3.x which is actually out, is not really usable for anything
el
18 matches
Mail list logo
