Re: compatibility of OpenSSL and GPL'ed plugins

2004-07-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 11:13:41AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Let's consider a program, released under a MIT/X11 license and linked > > with OpenSSL. Some GPL'ed plugins (which are dlopen'ed at run time) are > > distributed with the program. > > Is distribution of this package a GPL violatio

Re: compatibility of OpenSSL and GPL'ed plugins

2004-07-17 Thread Florian Weimer
* Marco d'Itri: > Let's consider a program, released under a MIT/X11 license and linked > with OpenSSL. Some GPL'ed plugins (which are dlopen'ed at run time) are > distributed with the program. > Is distribution of this package a GPL violation? If the plug-in is written from scratch (so it doesn'

Re: compatibility of OpenSSL and GPL'ed plugins

2004-07-16 Thread Jacobo Tarrio
O Venres, 16 de Xullo de 2004 ás 01:11:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri escribía: > Let's consider a program, released under a MIT/X11 license and linked > with OpenSSL. Some GPL'ed plugins (which are dlopen'ed at run time) are > distributed with the program. > Is distribution of this package a GPL violatio

Re: compatibility of OpenSSL and GPL'ed plugins

2004-07-15 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-07-16 00:11:52 +0100 Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Let's consider a program, released under a MIT/X11 license and linked with OpenSSL. Some GPL'ed plugins (which are dlopen'ed at run time) are distributed with the program. Is distribution of this package a GPL violation? Le