On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:45:59AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anthony> Debian and denial are remarkably similar words. Quoting
> Anthony> mantras like that don't really further anyone's
> Anthony> understanding of anythi
> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anthony> Debian and denial are remarkably similar words. Quoting
Anthony> mantras like that don't really further anyone's
Anthony> understanding of anything. If you consider
Anthony> stable/main/binary-i386/* to be a "prod
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:22:52PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:17:11PM -0700, Stephen Zander
> Richard> wrote: [...]
> >> provided that: (i) the Linux Ports of the JDK is not
> >
> "Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:17:11PM -0700, Stephen Zander
Richard> wrote: [...]
>> provided that: (i) the Linux Ports of the JDK is not
>> integrated, bundled, combined or associated in any way with a
>> pr
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:17:11PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
[...]
> provided that: (i) the Linux Ports of the
> JDK is not integrated, bundled, combined or associated in any way
> with a product,
This still holds, right? I would certainly say that the non-free archive
is "associated"
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> It's also grammatically incorrect, and should say "asserts
Steve> its right". Let's not have Sun come after us all on a
Steve> technicality, please. :)
You know, I even left out the apostrophe at first & then decided it
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:40:07AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> I assume this is the part from which you expect distributability:
> > Blackdown Java-Linux Team Supplemental Terms
> > The Blackdown Java Linux team ("Blackdown"), as a Sun JDK 1.1 source
> > code licencess, asserts it's right to
> "Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> First, I find this a curious phrasing. "asserts it's
Richard> right"? On what basis? Should we take this assertion at
Richard> face value? If this is a right that Sun granted, it
Richard> would be nice to s
I assume this is the part from which you expect distributability:
> Blackdown Java-Linux Team Supplemental Terms
>
> The Blackdown Java Linux team ("Blackdown"), as a Sun JDK 1.1 source
> code licencess, asserts it's right to amend the terms of the Binary
> Code License Agreement (collectively the
9 matches
Mail list logo
