Re: Unicode.org files

2006-01-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:50:11 +0100 Simon Josefsson wrote: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I believe that is a free software license. RMS has reviewed it and > > thought it was OK. If people here would review it as well, that may > > be useful. > > To simplify review, below

Re: Unicode.org files

2006-01-26 Thread Simon Josefsson
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe that is a free software license. RMS has reviewed it and > thought it was OK. If people here would review it as well, that may > be useful. To simplify review, below is the Unicode Consortium's license. FWIW, I recall that RMS reviewed it

Re: Unicode.org files

2006-01-26 Thread Simon Josefsson
Daniel Glassey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > This isn't in Debian yet but a couple of projects (1 LGPL and 1 GPL) I > am trying to package include files from the Unicode site. > > http://www.unicode.org/Public/PROGRAMS/CVTUTF/ConvertUTF.c > http://www.unicode.org/Public/PROGRAMS/CVTUTF/Conve

Re: Unicode.org files

2006-01-26 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Daniel! You wrote: > Should I go ahead and look for alternative implementations or would this > be accepted in Debian in a GPL or LGPL licensed package? Why not just use the iconv or recode implementations? -- Kind regards, +