Re: The 'CMU' license

1999-02-04 Thread Jules Bean
On 4 Feb 1999, John Hasler wrote: > Jules Bean wrote: > > How do we feel about the phrase 'without fee' in this context? > > Brian Ristuccia wrote: > > Sounds to me like this means "without paying CMU any money", not "you can't > > charge any money." > > Jules Bean writes: > > I also think that'

Re: The 'CMU' license

1999-02-04 Thread John Hasler
Jules Bean wrote: > How do we feel about the phrase 'without fee' in this context? Brian Ristuccia wrote: > Sounds to me like this means "without paying CMU any money", not "you can't > charge any money." Jules Bean writes: > I also think that's what they mean. I agree, though I wish they wouldn

Re: The 'CMU' license

1999-02-04 Thread Jules Bean
On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Brian Ristuccia wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 06:46:56PM +, Jules Bean wrote: > > > > I'm trying to package a shiny new rarpd for Debian which carries this > > license. > > > > How do we feel about the phrase 'without fee' in this context? > > > > Sounds to me like t

Re: The 'CMU' license

1999-02-04 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 06:46:56PM +, Jules Bean wrote: > > I'm trying to package a shiny new rarpd for Debian which carries this > license. > > How do we feel about the phrase 'without fee' in this context? > Sounds to me like this means "without paying CMU any money", not "you can't charg