Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)

2004-01-21 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Jan 18, 2004, at 12:45, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Thanks for your help. ArgoUML project[1] does put this library in their CVS[2]. Do you think it's legal? I already did warn them[3], Was I wrong or right? There are provisions in there allowing redistribution under certain terms. It's a very

Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)

2004-01-18 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 21:29, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> I did Cc: debian-legal to have a look at the license but I think it's >> completly non-free! > > Not only non-free, but so bad we couldn't even put it in the non-free > section. > > For example

Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)

2004-01-17 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 21:29, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > I did Cc: debian-legal to have a look at the license but I think it's > completly non-free! Not only non-free, but so bad we couldn't even put it in the non-free section. For example, way down in the third set of terms(!) it has a non-compete