[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> My humble opinion is that it is almost DFSG-free. The only problem
>> section is 3.1 (requires changes to be sent to upstream).
>Right, it fails the so-called "desert island test".
No part of the DFSG justifies this "test", so it's not enough to make
the license non-fre
Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for comments on:
> * 0. Definitions
>
> o 0.1. IBPP
> 'IBPP' is primarily a set of programming interfaces,
> initially written in the C++ language, which makes it easier to develop
> any other programming work which need to communic
Francesco Poli wrote:
> Apart from clause 3.1 (which must be dropped anyway, if DFSG-freeness is
> sought), this license seems to try to grant a set of permissions not too
> different from the ones granted by the Expat a.k.a. MIT license
> (http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt).
>
> If I were you
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:40:16 +0200 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
[...]
> Either way, I need your comments about DFSG-compatibility of IBPP
> license. Note that this license is newly accomodated after leaving MPL
> (partly due to me arguing against MPL), so the intent is to make it
> free.
>
> License can
Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following license is used for IBPP[1] - a library for working with
> Firebird/Interbase database servers.
>
> This library is included (at source level) in FlameRobin[2] - a
> graphical tool for working with Firebird/Interbase which I intent
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:40:16PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> The following license is used for IBPP[1] - a library for working with
> Firebird/Interbase database servers.
>
> This library is included (at source level) in FlameRobin[
6 matches
Mail list logo
