Re: Open Use logo licensing

2004-08-20 Thread Matthew Garrett
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have consensus that we *want* to do this, and we have suggested several > ways to do so while preserving trademark rights (basically, just saying "This > doesn't grant a trademark license."). We've had this consensus for over a > year, I believe

Re: Open Use logo licensing

2004-08-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Freek Dijkstra wrote: > I'm not sure which project Bruce refers to when he talks about the "project > leader" here. I assume the "Debian project". Apparently. SPI will change the > licence if the Debian project tells them to. Debian-legal: should Martin Michlmayr, the DPL, be asked to change the