* Michelle Konzack:
> This would even mean, if we work together, and I build the EPS filee and
> I give it to you (the OSS guy) to review and continue the work on it, it
> would be a violation of the Adobe License.
I'm not sure. You need to check what the Adobe license says.
We often make polic
Hello Florian Weimer,
Am 2012-08-09 21:52:25, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> * Michelle Konzack:
> > I have "Adobe Ilustrator" (just a standard installation from CD with the
> > legal serialnumber) runing under WINE and if I create an EPS, it has the
> > same header!
> > Does this now mean, I h
* Michelle Konzack:
> I have "Adobe Ilustrator" (just a standard installation from CD with the
> legal serialnumber) runing under WINE and if I create an EPS, it has the
> same header!
>
> Does this now mean, I have not the right to distrigbute my work freely?
Probably yes. EPS files created by
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 09:51 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:25:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:03:52PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
>>>
I'm maintaining a package that conta
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Michael Wild
wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I'm maintaining a package that contains an EPS image created with Adobe
> Illustrator and hence contains postscript library code that is
> copyrighted by Adobe, e.g.:
>
> * Copyright(C)2000-2006 Adobe Systems, Inc. All Rights Rese
Hello Bart Martens,
Am 2012-08-05 22:12:31, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:59:14PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > I have "Adobe Ilustrator" (just a standard installation from CD with the
> > legal serialnumber) runing under WINE and if I create an EPS, it has the
Hello Bernhard R. Link,
Am 2012-08-05 08:59:30, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> | 16.6.3 Customer may take a copy of the font(s) Customer has used for a
> | particular file to a commercial printer or other service bureau, and
> | such service bureau may use the font(s) to process its file, provi
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:59:14PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I have "Adobe Ilustrator" (just a standard installation from CD with the
> legal serialnumber) runing under WINE and if I create an EPS, it has the
> same header!
>
> Does this now mean, I have not the right to distrigbute my work
Hello Bernhard R. Link,
Am 2012-08-01 00:45:27, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> If someone claims he has a license from Adobe, then well, believe him
> unless you run into some statement from Adobe that they do not give
> away any licenses like that. If someone just claims it is under a free
> l
* Christofer C. Bell [120805 02:56]:
> Are we honestly to believe that this document, the authorship of which
> is entirely mine, cannot be redistributed by me because Apple holds a
> copyright to it? That makes no sense whatsoever.
The copyright of contents displayed are yours, but not the embe
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> Bart Martens writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 01:29:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > The sensible *default* assumption is that when an upstream asserts
> > > that the license on their work is $foo, they know what they're
> > > talk
Bart Martens writes:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 01:29:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The sensible *default* assumption is that when an upstream asserts
> > that the license on their work is $foo, they know what they're
> > talking about
>
> Yes, "on their work".
>
> > even when portions are
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:03:43PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 05:20:29PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:40:00AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:24:25AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > > Every copyright notice means that
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 05:20:29PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:40:00AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:24:25AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > Every copyright notice means that there is at least a part copyrighted by
> > > the
> > > mentioned c
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:40:00AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:24:25AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Every copyright notice means that there is at least a part copyrighted by
> > the
> > mentioned copyright holder.
>
> Every?
Yes.
> Like this one, that can be found i
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:24:25AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:01:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > > > even
> > > > when portions are copyright other people/entities.
> >
> > > If there is a hint
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:01:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > > even
> > > when portions are copyright other people/entities.
>
> > If there is a hint to distrust what people claim about their work,
> > I see no way how a ju
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 01:29:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 07:51:55PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > A copyright statement does not, by itself, say anything about the license
> > > of
> > > the work. Since Illustrator is frequently used for producing output files
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > even
> > when portions are copyright other people/entities.
> If there is a hint to distrust what people claim about their work,
> I see no way how a judge could believe a "But I was told it is" if one
> did not at least check w
* Steve Langasek [120731 22:35]:
> Correct but irrelevant. No one here has provided any evidence one way or
> the other about whether Adobe has given a license.
>
> The sensible *default* assumption is that when an upstream asserts that the
> license on their work is $foo, they know what they're
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 07:51:55PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > A copyright statement does not, by itself, say anything about the license of
> > the work. Since Illustrator is frequently used for producing output files
> > that are expected to be distributed, it would be reasonable to assume tha
On 07/31/2012 09:51 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:25:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:03:52PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
>>
>>> I'm maintaining a package that contains an EPS image created with Adobe
>>> Illustrator and hence c
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:25:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:03:52PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
>
> > I'm maintaining a package that contains an EPS image created with Adobe
> > Illustrator and hence contains postscript library code that is
> > copy
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:25:44PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 09:17 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
> >> Strange thing is, most of it is simply boilerplate that is not even
> >> used. Running it through eps2eps (a ghostscript wrapper) br
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:03:52PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
> I'm maintaining a package that contains an EPS image created with Adobe
> Illustrator and hence contains postscript library code that is
> copyrighted by Adobe, e.g.:
> * Copyright(C)2000-2006 Adobe Systems, Inc. All Rig
On 07/31/2012 09:17 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
>
>> I'm maintaining a package that contains an EPS image created with Adobe
>> Illustrator and hence contains postscript library code that is
>> copyrighted by Adobe, e.g.:
> ...
>> Does this make the
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
> I'm maintaining a package that contains an EPS image created with Adobe
> Illustrator and hence contains postscript library code that is
> copyrighted by Adobe, e.g.:
...
> Does this make the file non-redistributable and non-DFSG free? If not,
27 matches
Mail list logo
