Jules Bean writes:
> Seems like a DFSG-free, if rather agressively worded ;) license.
> Let's wait for another opinion, though (John?)
Looks ok to me. They may have opened themselves up to some exploits, but
that's between them and their attorney.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
D
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, David Starner wrote:
> http://www.lyx.org/license.html has a new clarification - this appears
> to be more than enough to solve our problems. (IMO) All we need to do is
> add that to the copyright file. Does anyone disagree, and want to hold
> the bug open after that is done?
2 matches
Mail list logo