On 30/12/2007, Arnoud Engelfriet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso wrote:
> > A lot of other local laws don't define "intellectual property", but
> > people use the term anyways as if it were legally defined. It's sad
> > news to see that France does and that other laws are also
Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso wrote:
> A lot of other local laws don't define "intellectual property", but
> people use the term anyways as if it were legally defined. It's sad
> news to see that France does and that other laws are also doing it.
> :-(
Why do you think it's necessary for a law to define
On 29/12/2007, Sylvestre Ledru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:20:14 -0600, "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Does French law define "intellectual property"? What does it define it to
> > be?
>
> Of course, our law defines what is an "intellectual pr
Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 07/12/2007, Sylvestre Ledru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it has been
> > designed for the french (and european) law which is quite specific about
> > intellectual property.
>
> Does French law define "intellectual property"? What does it define it to be?
Int
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:20:14 -0600, "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/12/2007, Sylvestre Ledru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it has been
>> designed for the french (and european) law which is quite specific about
>> intellectual property.
>
> Does French law define "
On 07/12/2007, Sylvestre Ledru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it has been
> designed for the french (and european) law which is quite specific about
> intellectual property.
Does French law define "intellectual property"? What does it define it to be?
- Jordi G. H.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
"John Halton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:33:14PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
Are you implying you have any evidence that the GNU GPL v2 is
*incompatible* with french law?!?
I gather that one reason for some of the changes in GPL v2
> > and it is also compatible with the french law !
>
> Are you implying you have any evidence that the GNU GPL v2 is
> *incompatible* with french law?!?
I didn't say that. I am just saying (or trying to say) that it has been
designed for the french (and european) law which is quite specific abou
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:33:14PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Are you implying you have any evidence that the GNU GPL v2 is
> *incompatible* with french law?!?
I gather that one reason for some of the changes in GPL v2 (in
particular the change from "distribute" to "propogate/convey") was to
a
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:30:35 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > However, why not just adopt the plain GNU GPL v2 ?
> CECILL is from INRIA too
I am aware of that.
The question could have as well been phrased: "why not accept the fact
that license proliferation is bad and stop using a new license, w
> However, why not just adopt the plain GNU GPL v2 ?
CECILL is from INRIA too and it is also compatible with the french law !
> > > Firstoff, from a technical point of view, shipping the *exact same
> > > code* in two different packages does not seem to be a good idea.
> > > Could this duplication
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:58:50 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > >
> > > I am one of the developer of Scilab. We are rewriting the GUI from
> > > scratch using Java (Swing) and JOGL.
> > > Since we prefer to have Scilab packages available (especially
> > > because Scilab is going to change his lice
> >
> > I am one of the developer of Scilab. We are rewriting the GUI from
> > scratch using Java (Swing) and JOGL.
> > Since we prefer to have Scilab packages available (especially because
> > Scilab is going to change his license to a free one),
>
> That's really good news!
> Which license are
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:37:40 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
>
> I am one of the developer of Scilab. We are rewriting the GUI from
> scratch using Java (Swing) and JOGL.
> Since we prefer to have Scilab packages available (especially because
> Scilab is going to change his license t
14 matches
Mail list logo
