Re: GFDL and incompatibility

2003-09-26 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have never considered the question of whether the GFDL is a free > software license. The question seems purely academic, since it is (1) > not meant as a license for programs, and (2) clearly an annoying > license to use for programs. So I don't k

Re: GFDL and incompatibility

2003-09-25 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The text in the manual is usually not suitable for a doc string, and > vice versa. I don't copy text from the Emacs manual into a doc > string, even though the FSF as copyright holder for both could do so. The problem is that you can't even re-edit