-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Jun 2002, Henning Makholm wrote:
>Scripsit John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> True enough, but what if they were legally binding electronic signatures?
>> Let someone try to attach a signature where it wasn't supposed to be and
>> watch them
Scripsit John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> True enough, but what if they were legally binding electronic signatures?
> Let someone try to attach a signature where it wasn't supposed to be and
> watch them go to jail PDQ
No, the point about electronic signatures is that the only one who
*can*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:51:23PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
>> Wouldn't the endorsements issue be best resolved by licensing the
>> endorsements separately from the rest of the document?
>
>Names are n
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:51:23PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> Wouldn't the endorsements issue be best resolved by licensing the
> endorsements separately from the rest of the document?
Names are not subject to copyright protection, and not everyone has the
money or inclination to trademark his
4 matches
Mail list logo
