On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Note that under US trademark law, no use is so pathetic that it isn't
> worth wasting your time on: if you're aware of an infringing use, and
> you make no effort to enforce your trademark, this sets a legal
> precedent that will come back to haunt you l
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:40:43PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Now, I have no clue how US copyright and trademark law interacts with
> Sweden's trademark and copyright law... so a reasonable middle of the
> road approach might be to ask them nicely to consider changing their
> logo.
> Alternativ
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Alfie's post reminds me that I need clarification on some point: the
> fact that the Debian logo, which is shipped within many of our packages,
> is not DFSG-free.
> It was already raised:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200111
On 2003-08-27 18:23:49 +0100 Josselin Mouette
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alfie's post reminds me that I need clarification on some point: the
fact that the Debian logo, which is shipped within many of our
packages,
is not DFSG-free.
I agree. This seems not to be free software, as it tries
4 matches
Mail list logo
