Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:33:59PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
>>>I don't think many people are seriously advocating that the DFSG only
>>>applies to restrictions made under copyright law.
>>
>>In that thread, several people suggested that a restriction such as "You
>>may
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 01:42:03AM -0700, tom said
> Maybe I should know much about buld_deb packaging, but from what I can
> read from mozilla [0], dealing with logos and trademark are allowed if
> there is no change in the code. Building a .deb is a change of the
> code, or is just an adaptation
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:33:59PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > I don't think many people are seriously advocating that the DFSG only
> > applies to restrictions made under copyright law.
>
> In that thread, several people suggested that a restriction such as "You
> may not use this logo, or an
Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 06:18:08AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>Andrew Suffield wrote:
>>>On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:30:55PM -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
>>>
Are there any other examples of restrictions placed on open-source licenses
that Debian has had to deal with
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 06:18:08AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:30:55PM -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> >
> >>Are there any other examples of restrictions placed on open-source licenses
> >>that Debian has had to deal with in the past? When a p
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:30:55PM -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
>
>>Are there any other examples of restrictions placed on open-source licenses
>>that Debian has had to deal with in the past? When a package is resricted
>>by trademark usage, does Debian have a policy to e
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:30:55PM -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> Has anyone at Debian sought permission from the Mozilla Organization to use
> the Mozilla trademarks in its packages? In your legal opinions, would it
> make a substantive difference?
To my knowledge, no one associated with the Moz
On 2004-09-09 06:30:55 +0100 Paul C. Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone at Debian sought permission from the Mozilla Organization
to use
the Mozilla trademarks in its packages? In your legal opinions, would
it make
a substantive difference?
I feel that Debian uses MF's trademarks t
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:30:55PM -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> Are there any other examples of restrictions placed on open-source licenses
> that Debian has had to deal with in the past? When a package is resricted
> by trademark usage, does Debian have a policy to effectively deal with it?
Th
Maybe I should know much about buld_deb packaging, but from what I can read
from mozilla [0], dealing with logos and trademark are allowed if there is no
change in the code.
Building a .deb is a change of the code, or is just an adaptation best fitable
for a different platform?
In the former cas
10 matches
Mail list logo
