Re: Copyright of debian/*

2021-01-04 Thread Christoph Biedl
John Scott wrote... > On Saturday, January 2, 2021 10:30:56 AM EST Matthew Vernon wrote: > > I have noticed some packages using the newer machine-readable copyright > > format, but not specifying any copyright for debian/* > That's not good practice. You should ask the package maintainer to inclu

Re: Copyright of debian/*

2021-01-02 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, David Prévot writes: > Le 02/01/2021 à 11:30, Matthew Vernon a écrit : > >> I have noticed some packages using the newer machine-readable >> copyright format, but not specifying any copyright for debian/* > > FWIW, I do that in most of the (simple) packages I’m maintaining: I’m > fine using

Re: Copyright of debian/*

2021-01-02 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Le 02/01/2021 à 11:30, Matthew Vernon a écrit : I have noticed some packages using the newer machine-readable copyright format, but not specifying any copyright for debian/* FWIW, I do that in most of the (simple) packages I’m maintaining: I’m fine using the same license as upstream, hen

Re: Copyright of debian/*

2021-01-02 Thread John Scott
On Saturday, January 2, 2021 10:30:56 AM EST Matthew Vernon wrote: > I have noticed some packages using the newer machine-readable copyright > format, but not specifying any copyright for debian/* That's not good practice. You should ask the package maintainer to include such information in debia