On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 10:38:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> "Copyright: GPL" is wrong. GPL is the license;
Yeah, I already pled no-contest to that brain fart.
> the debian/copyright file needs to list the copyright,
> which is a statement of the copyright *holder* and the
> year it was wri
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:09:06AM +1030, Ron wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > OTOH this debian/copyright is clearly deficient in many ways, but stop
> > accusing him of bad faith, you're just out of your mind.
> Thanks Pierre, you've just saved us al
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 05:39:06PM +, Ron wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > OTOH this debian/copyright is clearly deficient in many ways, but stop
> > accusing him of bad faith, you're just out of your mind.
>
> Thanks Pierre, you've just saved us
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> OTOH this debian/copyright is clearly deficient in many ways, but stop
> accusing him of bad faith, you're just out of your mind.
Thanks Pierre, you've just saved us all from my response to jeff's
wild slander from the hip.
Ther
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:01:05AM +, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> severity 451647 serious
> thanks
>
> Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> >Today I've filed a bugreport http://bugs.debian.org/451647 against
> >wacom-tools package. Its copyright file imho violates the policy (I
> >think I can cite it here si
5 matches
Mail list logo
