On Sun, 27 May 2007 10:21:26 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
> Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > what if the recording was of actual people playing actual
> > instruments? You know, like people always used to. How to you
> > generate that from 'source' at build time? what _is_ the source
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what if the recording was of actual people playing actual
> instruments? You know, like people always used to. How to you
> generate that from 'source' at build time? what _is_ the source?
The preferred form of the work for making modifications to it
Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Now, it would be preferable to be able to regenerate the
> > recording from the MIDI. Which would mean including the
> > soundfonts (instrument descriptions, basically) used. So the question
> > of whether they are free is also important.
>
> Really important,
On Fri, 25 May 2007 11:30:07 -0400 Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> >We must determine what is the preferred form for making modifications
> >to the song. I'm not sure an Ogg Vorbis + MIDI form qualifies...
[...]
> I believe that for a recording to be DFSG-free, we need *both*
>
Francesco Poli wrote:
>We must determine what is the preferred form for making modifications to
>the song. I'm not sure an Ogg Vorbis + MIDI form qualifies...
What sort of modifications?
...Actually, a concept from copyright law may help here. There are
*two* copyrights on any given recording.
On Sun, 13 May 2007 19:11:32 +0200 (CEST) Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
> --- Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > We must determine what is the preferred form for making
> > modifications to the song. I'm not sure an Ogg Vorbis + MIDI form
> > qualifies...
>
> I think that's quite comple
--- Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> We must determine what is the preferred form for making modifications to
> the song. I'm not sure an Ogg Vorbis + MIDI form qualifies...
I think that's quite complex to decide on a single-game basis, as that
decision might affect most of other
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:06:01 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote:
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > There's another issue with the remaining four songs, though.
> > Is their source available?
> > I mean: what's the preferred form[1] for making modifications to the
> > songs? Is this form
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, if the author says that it's a metal version of Ryu's theme, I
> think he means that the melody is the same, even though the musical
> genre is changed.
> *If* this is the case, I would call it a cover and hence I'm afraid it
> qualifies as an ad
9 matches
Mail list logo
