Previously Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> Why not simply:
>
> Copyright (C) 1999 Software in the Public Interest
> Verbatim copying and distribution of this logo is permitted in any
> medium, provided this notice is preserved.
That doesn't really work, since we want people to be able to take t
Previously Aron Fielder wrote:
> My next point isn't really a legal point. But there doesn't seem to be a
> small logo for use on web pages which say 'Powered by Debian' like some
> of the other distributions
But we could easily modify the liberal logo for that. In fact anyone
can modify it to add
Previously Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > `official license'
> > ==
> > I. may only be used if:
> >a) the product it is used for is made using a documented procudere we
> > make (for example official CD-creation)
> >b) if we give
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anthony Towns
writes
Hello, I'm not sure where this mail will go, but let's see what happens.
>This ought to be able to be *really* freely used -- to advertise Debian
>compatability for WordPerfect, to advertise printers and laptops that
>work with Debian, to adve
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christian Leutloff wrote:
> > Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > `liberal license'
> > > =
> > > I. Can be used by everyone
> > > II. May not be used to advertise non-free products
>
> > Why shouldn't a commercial compa
Christian Leutloff wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > `liberal license'
> > =
> > I. Can be used by everyone
> > II. May not be used to advertise non-free products
> Why shouldn't a commercial company says "Yes it runs with Debian" or
> "It's a Debian based
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> `liberal license'
> =
> I. Can be used by everyone
> II. May not be used to advertise non-free products
Why shouldn't a commercial company says "Yes it runs with Debian" or
"It's a Debian based product" and use the Debian logo for thi
Gordon Matzigkeit writes:
> Liberal:
> Copyright (C) 1999 Software in the Public Interest
> Verbatim copying and distribution of this logo is permitted in any
> medium, provided this notice is preserved.
That seems quite sufficient.
> Official:
I see no need for this at all.
--
John Hasler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I'm afraid I've let this linger way to long... People: we need
> logo licenses, and soon!
Aye, I've noticed. *scribbles in notebook more and more* I need more hours
in the day! AGH! ;P
> I propose we start by det
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I've let this linger way to long... People: we need
> logo licenses, and soon!
>
> I propose we start by determining what will be (dis)allowed in the
> licenses and then write it up properly.
>
> How about this for a simple start:
>
>
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 08:52:51AM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
>
> WA> `official license'
> WA> I. may only be used if: a) the product it is used for is made
> WA> using a documented procudere we make (for example official
> WA> CD-creation) b) if we give approval for its use
>
> WA> II.
> Wichert Akkerman writes:
WA> `liberal license'
WA> I. Can be used by everyone
WA> II. May not be used to advertise non-free products
I, personally, would like to see the `liberal' logo be at least as
free as verbatim copying without restriction. To me, it would suck if
Debian's only rea
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 12:40:14PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I'm afraid I've let this linger way to long... People: we need
> logo licenses, and soon!
>
> How about this for a simple start:
>
> `liberal license'
> =
> I. Can be used by everyone
> II. May not be used to adve
13 matches
Mail list logo
