Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-24 Thread Jacobo Tarrio
El viernes, 24 de marzo de 2006 a las 10:18:14 +0100, Jacobo Tarrio escribía: > Licenses that require that modifications are published are routinely > rejected by Debian. More properly, "Works distributed under licenses that..." -- Jacobo Tarrío | http://jacobo.tarrio.org/ -- To

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-24 Thread Jacobo Tarrio
El jueves, 23 de marzo de 2006 a las 22:59:46 +0100, Milan Babuskov escribía: > > The GPL itself covers these points. In principle, debian-legal discourages > >license proliferation. > GPL does cover it, but GPL requires that modifications are made public. No, it does not. It only requires that,

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-24 Thread milanb
Quoting Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The GPL itself covers these points. In principle, debian-legal discourages >license proliferation. GPL does cover it, but GPL requires that modifications are made public. We don't want that. The GPL does not require this. I re-read GPL today (afte

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Milan Babuskov wrote: > Jacobo Tarrio wrote: > >>>1. allow anyone to download, copy and redistribute FR source as it is. > >>>2. if someone makes modifications for his own use, he is not obligated > >>>to publish them > >>>3. if someone makes modifications and makes executable

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-23 Thread Milan Babuskov
Jacobo Tarrio wrote: 1. allow anyone to download, copy and redistribute FR source as it is. 2. if someone makes modifications for his own use, he is not obligated to publish them 3. if someone makes modifications and makes executable version available, he must make the modifications available to

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-23 Thread Jacobo Tarrio
El jueves, 23 de marzo de 2006 a las 15:55:55 +0200, Damyan Ivanov escribía: > > 1. allow anyone to download, copy and redistribute FR source as it is. > > 2. if someone makes modifications for his own use, he is not obligated > > to publish them > > 3. if someone makes modifications and makes exe

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-23 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Hi, Milan, [Yet another cross-post to debian-legal, whose comments are needed at the lower part of this mail. Thanks] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes. If possible, I intend to convince everyone to dual license FR under > GPL and someting else. How? If