On Thu, 18 May 2006 19:15:20 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 May 2006 03:34:12 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> > > The lack of a clear distinction between source and binary for
> > > video means that the licence is much more like copyleft than the
> > > origina
[Sorry for the dupe, Don. I meant to reply only to these lists.]
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2006, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Thanks for the diff.
> This is pretty much is just the XFree86 license; I don't think there's
> any problem with works under this licence being considered DFSG Free
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2006 03:34:12 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > This is a proposed licence text for the Debconf video recordings
> > (and potentially other audio and video recordings), based on the MIT/X
> > licence:
> >
> > Here's the text:
> >
> > Copyright (c)
> >
> >
3 matches
Mail list logo
