On Wednesday 30 January 2008 04:33:19 pm Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Hmm. This is frustrating, because on the one hand, it's probably worth
> avoiding an "innocent infringement defense"; on the other hand, updating
> copyright notices every year seems like a rather tedious task that
> people typical
Tristan Seligmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm. This is frustrating, because on the one hand, it's probably
> worth avoiding an "innocent infringement defense"; on the other
> hand, updating copyright notices every year seems like a rather
> tedious task that people typically don't ever get a
* Arnoud Engelfriet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-30 15:57:06 +0100]:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > My understanding is that a copyright declaration on the work makes it
> > easier to prove to a court that the recipient knows that the work *is*
> > copyrighted to the specified entity, and that the copyri
Ben Finney wrote:
> My understanding is that a copyright declaration on the work makes it
> easier to prove to a court that the recipient knows that the work *is*
> copyrighted to the specified entity, and that the copyright is
> current.
"Furthermore, in the event that a work is infringed, if the
Tristan Seligmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Copyright notices are only valid if they contain all three of:
> >
> > * The word "Copyright" and/or the copyright symbol "©"
> > * The year(s) the copyright began in the work
> > * The name of the lega
* Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-30 16:01:07 +1100]:
> Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On of the big things I need to know about are the copyright files.
> > Upstream doesn't specify any years for Copyright that I can find.
>
> Copyright notices are only valid if they c
6 matches
Mail list logo
