Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MJRay, may we have your comments too? Olivier sent me copies of some
> off-list discussion in which you tend to agree that new license is ok
> for Debian.
Nice to learn that copyright infringement is alive and well(!)
In short, I think it technically meets the
Francesco Poli wrote:
> A package that includes a part which is licensed in a non-free
> manner does *not* comply with the DFSG. I cannot extract that part
> of FlameRobin source code (namely the IBPP C++ classes) and
> exercise the freedoms the DFSG guarantee. Therefore, FlameRobin
> does not
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 12:00:25 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> I beleive this is not a problem, since the
> FlameRobin package would satisfy both licensing (original Expath and
> this modified thingy - the IBPP license) and the Social contract. I
> mention SC, because of this text: "We promise that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:48:53 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>>Please bear in mind
>>that IBPP is really to be used in FlameRobin's packaging, not by
>>itself.
>
> I see, but imagine which permissions someone would get, if he/she wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Triplett wrote:
> Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
>>=== The problematic? clause ===
>>Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or
>>organization (”You”) obtaining a copy of this software and associated
>>documentation fi
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> === The problematic? clause ===
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or
> organization (”You”) obtaining a copy of this software and associated
> documentation files covered by this license (the “Software”) to use
> the Software as par
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:48:53 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
[...]
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > What if I want to modify the library itself and distribute the
> > result by itself?
>
> This is not permitted, AFAIU.
Then, I don't think the library can be considered DFSG-free...
>
> > Why have I to be
=== The problematic? clause ===
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or
organization (”You”) obtaining a copy of this software and associated
documentation files covered by this license (the “Software”) to use
the Software as part of another work; to modify i
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:03:53 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Hi, Jacobo,
>
> Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
[...]
> > It allows to modify the library if it is needed to make it work
> > with other
> > piece of software ("for that purpose" == "to use the Software as
> > part of another work"), but that wordi
Hi, Jacobo,
Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
El jueves, 30 de marzo de 2006 a las 16:33:59 +0300, Damyan Ivanov escribía:
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or
organization (???You???) obtaining a copy of this software and associated
documentation files covered by this license (th
El jueves, 30 de marzo de 2006 a las 16:33:59 +0300, Damyan Ivanov escribía:
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or
> organization (???You???) obtaining a copy of this software and associated
> documentation files covered by this license (the ???Software???) to use
> the
Hi,
This is the third time I bring here this software's license. It is
changed again, due to my and this list's concerns about the last
license it used.
(A brief summary)
IBPP is a library that is intented to be included in other programs
sources, i.e. to be used as part of other projects, not to
12 matches
Mail list logo
