RE: "Preferred form of work" Re: Keyspan Firmware fun

2001-04-26 Thread Sam Johnston
.debian.org Subject: Re: "Preferred form of work" Re: Keyspan Firmware fun On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:47:22PM -0600, Walter Landry wrote: > > What about if the preferred form changes? For example, you have two > > authors, one who keeps the program as a literate program and th

Re: "Preferred form of work" Re: Keyspan Firmware fun

2001-04-26 Thread Walter Landry
> > The simple answer is that the code must be in the preferred form of > > the person distributing the code. > > But where does it say that in the GPL, or in the DFSG? That has too > many funky implications for me to like that answer. If A gives code > to B, the whole point of free software is

Re: "Preferred form of work" Re: Keyspan Firmware fun

2001-04-26 Thread David Starner
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:47:22PM -0600, Walter Landry wrote: > > What about if the preferred form changes? For example, you have two > > authors, one who keeps the program as a literate program and the > > other one who keeps it as straight source, and they convert it whenever > > they exchange

Re: "Preferred form of work" Re: Keyspan Firmware fun

2001-04-26 Thread Walter Landry
> What about if the preferred form changes? For example, you have two > authors, one who keeps the program as a literate program and the > other one who keeps it as straight source, and they convert it whenever > they exchange code. Is the preferred form literate or illiterate? Can > the literate