Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 19 May 2006 11:55:56 +0200 Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 19:56:21 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be > >> -distributed with all copies and transcodings of the reco

Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-19 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, 18 May 2006 19:56:21 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be >> -distributed with all copies and transcodings of the recording or >> +distributed with all copies, transformations and adaptat

Re: [Debconf-video] Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-18 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 18 May 2006 19:15:20 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Mon, 15 May 2006 03:34:12 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > > > The lack of a clear distinction between source and binary for > > > video means that the licence is much more like copyleft than the > > > origina

Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-18 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 18 May 2006 19:56:21 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > Here's a new draft. This is an improvement. [...] > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be > -distributed with all copies and transcodings of the recording or > +distributed with all copies, transformations and ad

Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
Here's a new draft. I've changed "recording" to "work" throughout and replaced "transcode" with "transform" and "adapt", based on the terminology CC uses. --- debconf-video-licence.draft12006-05-14 21:18:51.0 -0500 +++ debconf-video-licence.draft22006-05-18 13:48:51.226221

Re: [Debconf-video] Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
[Sorry for the dupe, Don. I meant to reply only to these lists.] Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Ben Hutchings wrote: Thanks for the diff. > This is pretty much is just the XFree86 license; I don't think there's > any problem with works under this licence being considered DFSG Free

Re: [Debconf-video] Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
Francesco Poli wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2006 03:34:12 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > This is a proposed licence text for the Debconf video recordings > > (and potentially other audio and video recordings), based on the MIT/X > > licence: > > > > Here's the text: > > > > Copyright (c) > > > >

Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-15 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 15 May 2006 03:34:12 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is a proposed licence text for the Debconf video recordings > (and potentially other audio and video recordings), based on the MIT/X > licence: > > Here's the text: > > Copyright (c) > > Permission is hereby granted, free of charg

Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-14 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is a proposed licence text for the Debconf video recordings > (and potentially other audio and video recordings), based on the > MIT/X licence: Copyright [-(C) 1994-2003 The XFree86 Project, Inc. All Rights Reserved.-] {+(c) +} Permission is he

Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings

2006-05-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
This is a proposed licence text for the Debconf video recordings (and potentially other audio and video recordings), based on the MIT/X licence: Here's the text: Copyright (c) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this recording, to deal in the recordi