On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:48:00 Don Armstrong wrote:
You really want some sort of tacit assent though. Like a checkbox or
simlar that people have to check to indicate that their post is
licensed under a specific license.[1] Implicit assent is pretty weak.
You also may consider having some sort of
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:11:56PM +0200, Sebastian Feltel wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 23:32:17, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > It probably isn't legitimate to claim a license in this manner in most
> > jurisdictions anyway. You normally need an explicit grant from the
> > copyr
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Sebastian Feltel wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 23:32:17, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > It probably isn't legitimate to claim a license in this manner in most
> > jurisdictions anyway. You normally need an explicit grant from the
> > copyright holder (while there are some case-l
Hello Andrew,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 23:32:17, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> It probably isn't legitimate to claim a license in this manner in most
> jurisdictions anyway. You normally need an explicit grant from the
> copyright holder (while there are some case-law precedents in some
> places for ce
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 07:28:12PM +0200, Sebastian Feltel wrote:
> The new introductory statement will look like this:
> ---
> "All Postings published in the forums/databases of this website are -if
> they were created or modifie
Hi,
some time ago I asked [1] for the prefered license for a debian web
forum. Now its time to force the license change for my forum [2] and
so I want you to ask again if some plans I made are correct.
- Changing license by date
I want to change the license for postings which arrive after 01.01
6 matches
Mail list logo
