There would appear to be a contradiction between section 2.0, and the
above COPYRIGHT.images statement, although I am not sure. I have never
really understood just how graphics files, which are free standing
components, are covered by the GPL.
By "free-standing", do you mean that
On 8 Feb, Marco van Hylckama Vlieg wrote:
> This license seems like an ok way to go. We could also add some sort of
> moral message to the notice, stating that it's allowed to use the graphics in
> other software but that it's considered somewhat lame to steal the look
> from an existing program.
On 6 Feb, Dale James Thompson wrote:
> A problem exists with me making a debian package for postilion. The new
> copyright for the graphics files is not compatible with the Debian Free
> Software Guidelines. This means that the postilion package will need to be
> taken out of the Main Debian Di
Nic,
A problem exists with me making a debian package for postilion. The new
copyright for the graphics files is not compatible with the Debian Free
Software Guidelines. This means that the postilion package will need to be
taken out of the Main Debian Distribution and placed in a non-free
dis
4 matches
Mail list logo
