Hi,
OK, I'll try to do that. Thank you very much to you and the rest for your
advices.
Cheers.
On Monday 12 July 2010 23:15:59 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:44:33 +0200 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > So what should I do about this whole issue? Summariz
On 13/07/10 14:54, Rudolf Polzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:35:14AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
>
>> On 13/07/10 06:38, Rudolf Polzer wrote:
>>
>>> I have another such case where I would be upstream. I currently have a
>>> library
>>> that I am the only copyright holder of, that is c
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:14:11PM -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Rudolf Polzer
> wrote:
>
>
> Do I then get into trouble with the GPL, as the source tarball contains
> code
> that links to non-GPL compatible code?
>
>
> You can't get in troubl
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Rudolf Polzer wrote:
>
> I have another such case where I would be upstream. I currently have a
> library
> that I am the only copyright holder of.
>
If you're the sole copyright holder, you can do whatever you like with the
code. The license is 100% irrelevant
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:38:50 +0200 Rudolf Polzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:15:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I think that probably the safest course of action is summarizing the
> > issues to upstream copyright holders, without directly involving
> > them in debian-legal discussio
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:15:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I think that probably the safest course of action is summarizing the
> issues to upstream copyright holders, without directly involving
> them in debian-legal discussions.
I have another such case where I would be upstream. I curren
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:44:33 +0200 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
[...]
> So what should I do about this whole issue? Summarize all the problems that
> we've pointed out and write to this list and the authors to discuss the
> whole issue together? Ask to them and post here about their exp
Hi,
On Saturday 03 July 2010 02:49:55 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 01 juillet 2010 à 00:40 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo a
>
> écrit :
> > > Of course, the quickest and easiest solution, until the licensing is
> > > clarified, is dropping the scripts from the package...
> >
> > Firs
On Sunday 04 July 2010 12:34:59 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 10:49:30 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 02:49:55 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 01 juillet 2010 à 00:40 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> > > a
>
> > > écrit :
> [...]
>
> > > > $ he
Le dimanche 04 juillet 2010 à 12:34 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> I wonder whether those "shaders" should be considered as purely
> functional in nature, and thus not copyrightable: I seem to recall that
> there's U.S. case law about a functionality exception to copyright
> protection, and the
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 10:49:30 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 02:49:55 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Le jeudi 01 juillet 2010 à 00:40 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo a
> > écrit :
[...]
> > > $ head -7 shaders/surface/metal.sl
> > > /* metal.sl - Standard metal surface
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 02:49:55 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 01 juillet 2010 à 00:40 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo a
> écrit :
> > > Of course, the quickest and easiest solution, until the licensing is
> > > clarified, is dropping the scripts from the package...
[...]
> > Maybe the
Le jeudi 01 juillet 2010 à 00:40 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo a
écrit :
> > Of course, the quickest and easiest solution, until the licensing is
> > clarified, is dropping the scripts from the package...
>
> First of all, I need to talk to the author personally when he's available,
> but
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:40:13 +0200 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 June 2010 23:27:41 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > > > I think the key questions here are:
> > > > 0) does the plugin itself comply with the DFSG?
> > >
> > > It doesn't have any copyright line, other than:
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 23:27:41 Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Actually it was already packaged long ago, I'm just packaging the
> > latest version since the maintainer has been unattending it for years.
>
> This is even more appreciated: in many cases, adopting an (officially
> or de-facto) orphane
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:49:39 +0200 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
[...]
> On Wednesday 30 June 2010 00:48:45 Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > I packaged Aqsis recently:
> > > http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/aqsis
> >
> > Thank you for doing so: it looks like an interesting tool...
>
Hi,
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 00:48:45 Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I packaged Aqsis recently:
> > http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/aqsis
>
> Thank you for doing so: it looks like an interesting tool...
Actually it was already packaged long ago, I'm just packaging the latest
version sinc
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:08:00 +0200 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Hello,
Hello! :-)
>
> (Please CC me in the replies, I'm not subscribed to the ML).
Done.
>
> I packaged Aqsis recently: http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/aqsis
Thank you for doing so: it looks like an inter
Hello,
(Please CC me in the replies, I'm not subscribed to the ML).
I packaged Aqsis recently: http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/aqsis
and it contains a kind of plugin, adaptor or something like that for a
software called Houdini [1], which is "a high-end 3D animation package
develope
19 matches
Mail list logo
