Re: PennMUSH license concerns.

2003-09-30 Thread Ervin Hearn III
Joel Baker wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:54:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: [snip] If some copyright holder somwhere feels his privileges are being infringed, then the onus is on them to bring the issue to our attention. We have been anything but careless. I do not think it is reasona

Re: Re: PennMUSH license concerns.

2003-09-30 Thread Ervin Hearn III
Sorry it's taken so long to respond, looks like I missed this mail when my mailserver was down. Thanks for the input. I've spoken with Alan Schwartz and there will be adding the full history to the copyright file with the next release. He is also going to look at the differences between the or

Re: PennMUSH license concerns.

2003-09-30 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:54:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:41:52PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > [snip] > > See above; the concern is not over any specific piece of code (in that the > > only ones I can point to, I'm fairly sure the license can be clarified > > for)

Re: PennMUSH license concerns.

2003-09-22 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:41:52PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: [snip] > See above; the concern is not over any specific piece of code (in that the > only ones I can point to, I'm fairly sure the license can be clarified > for), but in whether debian-legal is willing to accept the statements of > (in p

Re: PennMUSH license concerns.

2003-09-22 Thread Brian T. Sniffen
Ervin Hearn III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Concern has been expressed on the debian-devel list about license > status of PennMUSH and its legitimacy. PennMUSH was relicensed under > the Artistic License as of version 1.7.6p0 in November 2002. Aspects > of PennMUSH's code have been drawn from, o

Re: PennMUSH license concerns.

2003-09-22 Thread Joel Baker
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 01:39:30PM -0400, Ervin Hearn III wrote: > Concern has been expressed on the debian-devel list about license status of > PennMUSH and its legitimacy. PennMUSH was relicensed under the Artistic > License as of version 1.7.6p0 in November 2002. Aspects of PennMUSH's code >

PennMUSH license concerns.

2003-09-20 Thread Ervin Hearn III
Concern has been expressed on the debian-devel list about license status of PennMUSH and its legitimacy. PennMUSH was relicensed under the Artistic License as of version 1.7.6p0 in November 2002. Aspects of PennMUSH's code have been drawn from, of course, it's TinyMUD roots as well as its 'sibli