On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:40:02AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about
> > using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2]
> > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00188.html
> >
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about
> using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2]
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00188.html
> [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/12/msg00025.html
U
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 10:07:26AM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
>
> Couldn't GPL+exception be used? Or is the incompatibility both ways?
> (ie the PHP license has a clause prohibiting additional restrictions
> that the GPL would put on)
>
Possibly. I maintain httperf, which is GPL but also lin
On 12/9/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:05:52PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hi,
If you are the author of said application, you could release under the
MIT or BSD-type license.
Couldn't GPL+exception be used? Or is the incompatibility both ways?
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:05:52PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about
> using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2]
>
> I'm currently in need of QuickForm (v3) in a GNU GPL'd application,
> but QuickForm is re
Hi,
What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about
using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2]
I'm currently in need of QuickForm (v3) in a GNU GPL'd application,
but QuickForm is released under the PHP license, which is incompatible
:/
Thanks,
[1] http://lis
6 matches
Mail list logo