On Fri, Mar 19, 1999 at 03:50:02PM -0500, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> "J.H.M. Dassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>What I need is a nicely phrased "despite what the GPL requires, it's OK to
>link this code against Qt and redistribute the resulting binaries"
> statement
>- can someone here pr
On Fri, Mar 19, 1999 at 09:33:44PM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> I've talked to the author of a Qt-using GPL-ed program about resolving the
> license issue with his code; he's quite responsive.
>
> What I need is a nicely phrased "despite what the GPL requires, it's OK to
> link this code against
"J.H.M. Dassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What I need is a nicely phrased "despite what the GPL requires, it's OK to
link this code against Qt and redistribute the resulting binaries" statement
- can someone here provide one?
I would put the following license on each file in the progra
I've talked to the author of a Qt-using GPL-ed program about resolving the
license issue with his code; he's quite responsive.
What I need is a nicely phrased "despite what the GPL requires, it's OK to
link this code against Qt and redistribute the resulting binaries" statement
- can someone here
4 matches
Mail list logo