also sprach Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.04.1934 +0200]:
> Anyway, as a sidenote I encourage you to find an alternative if
> the licensing problem cannot be solved.
Sure. I doubt there is one though. Then again, I am likely not going
to need all the functionality. So yes, maybe I'll
reassign 251983 libcwd
tags 251983 - upstream
thanks
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 09:48:40PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am sorry to inform you that I have decided to move libcwd to
> Debian's non-free archive,
Moving from main to non-free can and should be done by the maintainer,
and is not a t
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:31:56PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.04.1926 +0200]:
> > We provide non-free packages when our users require them (Social
> > Contract). If there's no demand for libcwd there's no reason to
> > provide it. This is
also sprach Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.04.1926 +0200]:
> We provide non-free packages when our users require them (Social
> Contract). If there's no demand for libcwd there's no reason to
> provide it. This is you as the maintainer who should judge that.
I need the package myself.
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:13:20PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.04.1908 +0200]:
> > How many packages depend on this library? These should be moved
> > to contrib, and if they're not many you could consider removing
> > libcwd along with th
also sprach Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.04.1908 +0200]:
> How many packages depend on this library? These should be moved
> to contrib, and if they're not many you could consider removing
> libcwd along with them, too.
Consider removing it? Why?
Anyway, I doubt there is a single p
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 09:48:40PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Carlo,
>
> I am sorry to inform you that I have decided to move libcwd to
> Debian's non-free archive, where it will enjoy less support. The
> debian-legal team has deemed the QPL to be not DFSG-free, and even
> though I completely
Carlo,
I am sorry to inform you that I have decided to move libcwd to
Debian's non-free archive, where it will enjoy less support. The
debian-legal team has deemed the QPL to be not DFSG-free, and even
though I completely understand and subscribe to your rationale, I am
not capable of sustaining i
8 matches
Mail list logo
