Anton Gladky writes ("Re: MCD-ST Liberty SW License Agreement"):
> Thanks Ian for clarifying. I am discussing with
> OpenPilot-upstream possible solutions to solve
> the issue.
>
> The package without firmware is not quite useful.
All of the supported hardware ha
-04-15 15:43 GMT+02:00 Ian Jackson :
> Paul Wise writes ("Re: MCD-ST Liberty SW License Agreement"):
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> > non-transferable (whether by assignment or otherwise unless
>> > expressly authorized by ST) non sub-
Paul Wise writes ("Re: MCD-ST Liberty SW License Agreement"):
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > non-transferable (whether by assignment or otherwise unless
> > expressly authorized by ST) non sub- licensable
>
> Does this mean that people
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: MCD-ST Liberty SW License Agreement"):
> Only the ftp-masters can give you a canonical "yes" or "no" on what
> legal risk they are prepared to accept for non-free (or for that matter,
> for contrib or main), but they'd almost
Anton Gladky writes ("MCD-ST Liberty SW License Agreement"):
> Particularly, there is a 3rd-party code from hardware-manufacturer,
> which is licensed under their own
> "MCD-ST Liberty SW License Agreement V2" license" [2].
...
>
Hi,
thanks Simon and Paul for answers. It looks like really
almost impossible to put files with those license even
into the non-free.
Best regards
Anton
2015-04-15 3:07 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise :
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>
>> non-transferable
>> (whether by assignment
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> non-transferable
> (whether by assignment or otherwise unless expressly authorized by ST) non
> sub-
> licensable
Does this mean that people getting a copy of the software from Debian
do not automatically receive the same license as Debian?
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:07:14 +0100
Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 14/04/15 19:25, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > STMicroelectronics (“ST”) grants You a [...]
> > revocable, [...] license
>
> As far as I can see, ST can revoke this license at any time, i.e. they
> can say "no, we don't want to allow that any
On 14/04/15 19:25, Anton Gladky wrote:
> STMicroelectronics (“ST”) grants You a [...]
> revocable, [...] license
As far as I can see, ST can revoke this license at any time, i.e. they
can say "no, we don't want to allow that any more, any further
distribution of our software is copyright infringem
d/copyright before uploading and found some
files, which are probably make the package non-free.
Particularly, there is a 3rd-party code from hardware-manufacturer,
which is licensed under their own
"MCD-ST Liberty SW License Agreement V2" license" [2].
[1] https://www.openpil
10 matches
Mail list logo
