Re: Licensing of shareware quake data

2003-05-03 Thread Walter Landry
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan Woodland wrote: > > Im looking into packaging quake 1 for debian at the moment > > Quake 1 was in debian before. I forget why we dropped it, but I think it > had little to do with licensing and a lot to do with the maintainer at > the time. Anyway, I'm p

Re: Licensing of shareware quake data

2003-05-03 Thread Joey Hess
Alan Woodland wrote: > Im looking into packaging quake 1 for debian at the moment Quake 1 was in debian before. I forget why we dropped it, but I think it had little to do with licensing and a lot to do with the maintainer at the time. Anyway, I'm pretty sure this license was discussed a/ long tim

Re: Licensing of shareware quake data

2003-05-03 Thread Alan Woodland
I've attached it to this email (Im not sure the list permits attachments though) Alan Walter Landry wrote: Do you have a link to the whole license? It would be nice to see everything in context before making a decision. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] SHAREWARE VERSION: QUAK

Re: Licensing of shareware quake data

2003-05-03 Thread Walter Landry
Alan Woodland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im looking into packaging quake 1 for debian at the moment, and I > noticed the follwing clause in the license which I think might mean Im > permitted to include the whole compressed zip file inside a package > instead of having to get the user to downl

Licensing of shareware quake data

2003-05-03 Thread Alan Woodland
Im looking into packaging quake 1 for debian at the moment, and I noticed the follwing clause in the license which I think might mean Im permitted to include the whole compressed zip file inside a package instead of having to get the user to download it in and postinst script (like the nvidia d